swa.CDMI.tv - Tajiri na Lazaro - The Rich Man and Lazarus

swa.CDMI.tv

Tajiri na Lazaro - The Rich Man and Lazarus

Kwa karne nyingi wasomi wa Biblia wamekuwa wakistaajabishwa na kushangazwa na fumbo au fumbo hili la Tajiri na Lazaro kama ilivyosimuliwa na Bwana wetu. Sababu ya ugumu huu ni kutokana na ukweli kwamba wengine wanajaribu kuchukua hadithi hii kihalisi, lakini kwa kufanya hivyo inapingana na ushuhuda wa Biblia nzima na wa Bwana wetu Yesu Mwenyewe.

Mungu, Mwandishi wa Biblia, alitoa neno lake kwa Manabii na Mitume kupitia uongozi wa Roho wake Mtakatifu. Mtume Petro anaeleza jambo hili waziwazi katika 2 Petro 1:19-21 : “Nasi tunalo neno la unabii lililo imara zaidi; nanyi mwafanya vema mkiliangalia, kama nuru ing’aayo mahali penye giza, mpaka kutakapopambazuka, na nyota ya asubuhi kuzuka mioyoni mwenu; . Maana unabii haukuletwa popote kwa mapenzi ya mwanadamu, bali wanadamu walinena yaliyotoka kwa Mungu, wakiongozwa na Roho Mtakatifu.”

Mungu pia alisema kupitia Mtume Paulo maneno haya: “Kila andiko, lenye pumzi ya Mungu, lafaa kwa mafundisho, na kwa kuwaonya watu makosa yao, na kwa kuwaongoza, na kwa kuwaadibisha katika haki; kwa kila kazi njema.” 2 Timotheo 3:16, 17 .

Bwana wetu Yesu mwenyewe alisema, “Uwatakase kwa ile kweli; neno lako ndiyo kweli” Yohana 17:17.

Katika Marko 4:33, 34 imeelezwa juu ya Yesu, “... kwa mifano mingi ya namna hiyo aliwaambia neno, kadiri walivyoweza kulisikia; wala bila mfano hakusema nao. Na walipokuwa peke yao, aliwafafanulia wanafunzi wake mambo yote.”

Katika Mathayo 13:10-17 tunasoma, “Wanafunzi wakaja, wakamwambia, mbona wasema nao kwa mifano? Akajibu, kwa sababu mmepewa (wanafunzi wangu) kuzijua siri za ufalme wa mbinguni, lakini wao hawakujaliwa (wasioamini).

Katika mfano, jambo lililosemwa sio jambo lililokusudiwa. Kwa mfano, Bwana alipozungumza juu ya ngano na magugu, au kondoo na mbuzi, tunajua Hakuwa anazungumza juu ya mambo haya kihalisi, lakini badala yake alitumia haya kwa njia ya mfano kuwakilisha vikundi tofauti vya watu.

Tukiwa na mawazo haya akilini, tungependa kuchunguza fumbo hili au fumbo hili kwa nia ya kuonyesha kwamba Yesu anafundisha juu ya mwisho wa upesi wa kipindi kimoja na mwanzo wa kipindi kingine: yaani, kwamba Enzi ya Sheria au Enzi ya Kiyahudi ilikuwa inafungwa na kwamba. Enzi ya Injili ya Neema ilikuwa inaanza - kwa upendeleo kuhamishwa kutoka kwa Israeli kwenda kwa Mataifa.

Kabla ya kuanza, hata hivyo, tungependa kuonyesha upuuzi wa kuchukua mfano huu kihalisi. Tunanukuu mfano huu kwa ukamilifu:

Luka 16:19-31 “Palikuwa na mtu mmoja, tajiri, aliyevaa nguo za rangi ya zambarau na kitani safi, na kula sikuzote kwa anasa. Lakini palikuwa na mwombaji mmoja aitwaye Lazaro, ambaye alikuwa amejaa vidonda, naye alikuwa amelazwa langoni mwake, akitamani kushibishwa na makombo yaliyoanguka kutoka kwenye meza ya yule tajiri. Zaidi ya hayo mbwa wakaja na kulamba vidonda vyake. Ikawa huyo maskini akafa, akachukuliwa na malaika mpaka kifuani kwa Ibrahimu.

Tajiri naye akafa akazikwa. Naye alipokuwa katika mateso katika kuzimu, aliinua macho yake, akamwona Ibrahimu kwa mbali, na Lazaro kifuani mwake. Kisha akapaza sauti akasema, ‘Baba Ibrahimu, nihurumie, umtume Lazaro achovye ncha ya kidole chake majini, auburudishe ulimi wangu; kwa maana ninateswa katika moto huu. Lakini Ibrahimu akasema, Mwanangu, kumbuka ya kuwa ulipokea mema yako katika maisha yako, na Lazaro mabaya; lakini sasa yeye anafarijiwa na wewe unateswa. Na zaidi ya hayo, kati yetu na ninyi kumewekwa shimo kubwa, ili wale wanaotaka kutoka hapa kuja kwenu wasiweze, wala wale wa kutoka huko wasiweze kutufikia. Kisha akasema, Basi, baba, nakuomba, umtume nyumbani kwa baba yangu, kwa maana ninao ndugu watano, ili awashuhudie, wasije wao pia wakafika mahali hapa pa mateso. Ibrahimu akamwambia, Wana Musa na manabii; na wasikie.' Akasema, La, baba Ibrahimu; lakini mtu kutoka kwa wafu akiwaendea, watatubu. Lakini yeye akamwambia, 'Kama hawawasikii Mose na manabii, hawatashawishwa hata kama mtu atafufuka kutoka kwa wafu. "

Ikiwa Mfano huu ulichukuliwa kihalisi:

Ingekuwa kinyume na tabia ya Mungu ya upendo na rehema. Fikiria kile ambacho Mungu alisema kuhusu Israeli kutoa watoto wao kwa Baali katika Yeremia 19:5 : “Wamejenga mahali pa juu pa Baali ili kuwateketeza wana wao katika moto kama dhabihu kwa Baali—jambo ambalo sikuliamuru wala kulitaja, wala sikulitaja . inaingia akilini mwangu. ”

Ingekuwa kinyume na Fidia. Hakuna mahali inaposema kwamba tajiri alitenda dhambi, wala si dhambi kuwa tajiri. Ingawa wote ni watenda-dhambi, mshahara wa dhambi ni kifo, wala si mateso ya milele. Mungu alimwambia Adamu katika Mwa. 2:17 : “Usile matunda ya mti wa ujuzi wa mema na mabaya, kwa maana utakapokula matunda ya mti huo utakufa hakika.” Kwa sababu Adamu alifanya dhambi, Yesu alilipa fidia iliyohitajiwa ili kuwakomboa wanadamu kutokana na adhabu hiyo, Alikufa. 1 Tim. 2:5-6 inatuambia, “...kuna Mungu mmoja na mpatanishi kati ya Mungu na wanadamu ni mmoja, mwanadamu Kristo Yesu, ambaye alijitoa mwenyewe kuwa ukombozi kwa ajili ya watu wote—ushuhuda huo ambao umetolewa kwa wakati wake.

Itakuwa kinyume na Haki ya Mungu. Ikiwa mateso ya milele yangekuwa adhabu ya dhambi, basi kwa nini Mungu hakuwaambia hilo waziwazi Adamu na Hawa? Je! isingekuwa dhulma na dhulma kwa Mwenyezi Mungu kuwaficha?

Ingekataa Maandiko yanayoonyesha kifo, kuzimu au kaburi kama mahali pa kukosa fahamu. Ayubu 14:21 : “ Wanawe wakiheshimiwa yeye hajui; wakishushwa haoni. Baba aliyekufa hajui chochote kuhusu watoto wake. Zaburi 6:5 : “Hakuna mtu akukumbukapo alipokufa. Ni nani anayekusifu kutoka kaburini?” Zaburi 31:17 : “Ee BWANA, nisiaibike kwa maana nimekulilia; bali waovu na waaibishwe na walale kimya kuzimu.” Zaburi 115:17 “Si wafu wamsifuo BWANA, Wale washukao kunyamaza. Zab. 146:4 : “Pumzi yake hutoka, yeye hurudia udongo wake; siku hiyo mawazo yake yapotea.” Mhubiri 9:5, 6, 10 : “Kwa maana walio hai wanajua ya kwamba watakufa; lakini wafu hawajui neno lo lote, wala hawana ijara tena; maana kumbukumbu lao limesahauliwa.”

Tena upendo wao, na chuki yao, na husuda yao, sasa imepotea; wala hawana sehemu tena milele katika jambo lo lote linalofanyika chini ya jua. Basi lo lote mkono wako utakalolipata kulifanya, ulifanye kwa nguvu zako; kwa maana hakuna kazi, wala shauri, wala maarifa, wala hekima, huko kuzimu uendako wewe.”

Ingekataa Maandiko yanayofananisha kifo kuwa usingizi. Danieli 12:2: “Na wengi wa hao walalao katika mavumbi ya nchi wataamka, wengine wapate uzima wa milele, wengine aibu na kudharauliwa milele.” Yohana 11:11: “...Yeye (Yesu) akawaambia, ‘Rafiki yetu Lazaro amelala, lakini ninaenda kumwamsha.’” Matendo 7:60: “ Ndipo (Stefano) akapiga magoti na kulia. kwa sauti kuu, 'Bwana, usiwahesabie dhambi hii.' Naye alipokwisha kusema hayo, alilala usingizi.”

Matendo 13:36: “Kwa maana Daudi, akiisha kulitumikia mapenzi ya Mungu katika kizazi chake, alilala, akazikwa pamoja na baba zake, akaona uharibifu.” Matendo 2:34 inatuambia kwamba Daudi hakupanda mbinguni. 1 Wakorintho 15:17-20: “Na ikiwa Kristo hakufufuka, imani yenu ni bure; bado mko katika dhambi zenu! Ndipo wale waliolala katika Kristo wamepotea. Ikiwa katika maisha haya tu tuna matumaini katika Kristo, sisi ni wa kusikitisha zaidi kuliko watu wote. Lakini sasa Kristo amefufuka katika wafu, limbuko lao waliolala”.

Ungetegemea uwongo wa kwanza wa Shetani. Katika Mwanzo 2:17 tunasoma kwamba Mungu alimwambia Adamu kwamba siku ambayo angekula tunda lililokatazwa, atakufa (pembezoni: kufa utakufa”). Shetani alisingizia kwamba Mungu alikuwa mwongo kwenye Mwanzo 3:4-5 : “Nyoka akamwambia mwanamke, Hakika hamtakufa; Kwa maana Mungu anajua kwamba siku mtakayokula matunda ya mti huo macho yenu yatafunguliwa, nanyi mtakuwa kama Mungu, mkijua mema na mabaya.’”

Ingekuwa kinyume na Haki ya Mungu. Ikumbukwe kwamba mfano huu hausemi kwamba tajiri alikuwa mbaya au kwamba alikuwa amefanya jambo lolote baya. Kuwa tajiri na kuvaa zambarau na kitani safi, peke yake, hakumfanyi mtu kuwa mzuri au mbaya, na kwa hakika haingehalalisha kuadhibiwa katika mateso ya milele hata kama mahali kama hiyo pangekuwapo. Ikiwa ndivyo ilivyokuwa, Abrahamu, ambaye alikuwa tajiri sana, hangestahili kwa sababu iyo hiyo, kwa kuwa Mwa. 13:2 husema: “Abramu alikuwa tajiri sana wa mifugo, na fedha, na dhahabu. Hakuna jambo la wema, ama, kuhusu kuwa na njaa na maskini, na hakuna kinachosemwa kuhusu ikiwa mwombaji, Lazaro, alikuwa mwadilifu au mwenye imani. Kukubali mtazamo halisi wa kwa nini Lazaro alikwenda kifuani mwa Ibrahimu (mahali pa kibali) kungekuwa kuamini kwamba kibali kwa Mungu kingeweza kupatikana kwa kuwa maskini na kujaa vidonda. Hakuna kinachosemwa kuhusu tabia ya aidha wa wahusika wakuu katika fumbo hili.

Ingebatilisha ahadi ya Ibrahimu ya Mwanzo 12:3. Hapo Mungu anasema kwamba kupitia uzao wa Abrahamu familia zote za dunia zingebarikiwa. Tajiri na maskini ni sehemu ya jamaa zote za dunia. Yesu, Mzao wa Ibrahimu (Ona Wagalatia 3:16), alitoa maisha yake kuwa fidia kwa ajili ya watu wote ili kushuhudiwa kwa wakati ufaao (1Timotheo 2:5, 6).

Ingewasilisha upuuzi mwingine mwingi. Je, kifua cha Ibrahimu kingeweza kushika ombaomba wangapi maskini? Je, ni jambo la akili kutarajia maji kubaki kwenye ncha ya kidole cha Abrahamu, ikiwa yataingizwa kwenye joto kali kama hilo kutokana na moto huu ambao tajiri huyo sasa anajikuta? Je, “pembe kuu isiyobadilika” inaweza kuwa kitu halisi? “Na zaidi ya hayo, kati yetu na ninyi kumewekwa shimo kubwa, ili wale wanaotaka kutoka huku kwenda kwenu wasiweze, wala wale wa kutoka huko wasiweze kuja kwetu” (fu. 26). Ikiwa Abrahamu angekuwa mbinguni, angekuwa kiumbe wa roho na viumbe wa roho hawazuiliwi kuvuka shimo au shimo lolote halisi.

Inamfanya Ibrahimu kuwa mwongo. Ibrahimu anamwambia tajiri huyo kwamba haingekuwa na maana kumtuma mtu kwa ndugu zake watano kwa sababu hata kama mmoja aliyefufuliwa kutoka kwa wafu angeenda kwao, hawatasikia. Biblia inapingana na tafsiri hii halisi katika sehemu kadhaa. Lazaro wa Bethania alifufuliwa kutoka kwa wafu, na kwa ajili yake Wayahudi wengi walikuja kumkubali Yesu kama Masihi wao (Lk. 11:43-45). Petro alipomfufua Dorkasi kutoka kwa wafu, Matendo 9:42 inatuambia, “Hili likajulikana katika Yopa yote, na watu wengi (Wayahudi) wakamwamini Bwana. Kwa kuwa wengi walikuwa wameamini, kwa sababu ya wafu kufufuliwa, hilo lingepingana na tafsiri halisi ya sehemu hii ya maandishi.

Ingeondoa mfano huo kutoka kwa muktadha wake wa Kimaandiko. Swali la kujiuliza ni: Ni nani aliyekuwepo Yesu alipozungumza mfano huu? Je, kulikuwa na tajiri au maskini ombaomba? Ikiwa Yesu alimaanisha hivi kumrejelea mwanadamu yeyote kihalisi, ingeonekana kuwa yenye mantiki hii ingeonyeshwa na muktadha. Mistari ya 14 na 15 inatufunulia sisi waliokuwepo, na ilikuwa kwao kwamba Yesu alielekeza hadithi hii, akionyesha ukweli uliofichwa ambao ungetimia upesi. “Mafarisayo, waliopenda fedha, walisikia haya yote, wakamdhihaki Yesu. Akawaambia, Ninyi ndio mnaojidai haki mbele ya wanadamu, lakini Mungu anaijua mioyo yenu. Jambo ambalo linathaminiwa sana kati ya wanadamu ni chukizo machoni pa Mungu.’” Muktadha unafunua waziwazi kwamba ni Mafarisayo wasioamini ambao Yesu anaelekeza kwao mfano huo.

Acheni sasa tuchunguze tafsiri inayopatana na akili na ya mfano.

Tajiri fulani: Yule tajiri, kabla hajafa, anaonekana kulifananisha vema taifa la Kiyahudi, Israeli wa kimwili, wakati wa Enzi ya Kiyahudi. Alikuwa amevikwa nguo za rangi ya zambarau na kitani safi ambazo zingewawakilisha kuwa Ufalme wa Makuhani wa Mungu (Kut. 19:6) pamoja na ahadi zote walizopewa pekee, kwa kuwa zambarau na kitani safi zilikuwa zile ambazo wafalme walivaa. Walikula katika meza ya BWANA (hiyo neema ingewaongoza kwa Kristo). Kifo cha tajiri kinaonyesha Israeli ikiacha kuwa watu wa pekee na waliopendelewa na Mungu “Ninyi peke yenu niliowajua katika jamaa zote za dunia...” ( Amosi 3:2 ), jambo ambalo lilikuwa kweli katika enzi ya Wayahudi sasa. kumalizika. Wakati wa Enzi ya Injili, wakiwa taifa na kama watu waliopendelewa na Mungu, wametupwa mbali, kama inavyoonyeshwa na kifo cha yule tajiri na kutupwa kwake kuzimu. Katika Mathayo 23:38 tuna tamko la Yesu kwa taifa la Wayahudi, kwa sababu walimkataa: “Nyumba yenu mmeachiwa ukiwa...” Taifa la Kiyahudi “lilizikwa katika kuzimu (Hadesi)” au kusahaulika. Taifa lilitawanyika na “kufichwa” miongoni mwa mataifa mengine.

Ombaomba aitwaye Lazaro: Lazaro, kabla hajafa, angefananisha ipasavyo watu wa Mataifa wanaomcha Mungu katika Enzi yote ya Kiyahudi. Wakati wa Enzi hiyo, Wamataifa hawakustahili kula chakula cha kiroho kilichotolewa na Mungu kwa watu Wake waliopendelewa, Israeli (yule tajiri). Ingawa walitamani chakula cha kiroho, waliruhusiwa kula tu “makombo yaliyoanguka kutoka mezani.” Lazaro “alilala langoni,” akionyesha kwamba moyo wake ulitamani kubarikiwa. Yoshua 2:14; 1 Wafalme 10:3, 13; na 2 Wafalme 5:9, 10 zinaonyesha Wasio Wayahudi watatu wakipokea makombo hayo ya kweli, uponyaji na/au kibali. Vidonda vya mwombaji vinaweza kuwakilisha ugonjwa wake wa dhambi ambao hata haukufunikwa au kufanyiwa upatanisho kama ilivyokuwa kwa taifa la Israeli... Tunaambiwa kwamba mbwa walilamba vidonda vyake. Mbwa hawa wanaweza kuwa na picha ya wanafalsafa wa Kigiriki ambao walijaribu kusaidia na kuponya kwa njia za kibinadamu, lakini walishindwa. Baada ya Lazaro kufa anaonekana kuwa na taswira ya Watu wa Mataifa wanaomcha Mungu ambao wamepewa kibali cha Mungu katika Enzi ya Injili. Hilo laonyeshwa kwa kuhamishwa kwake kutoka cheo cha chini hadi kile cha kifua cha Abrahamu, mahali pa kibali. Tunapata kielezi cha upendeleo kama huo kama kimeandikwa katika Yohana 13:23 : “Basi mmoja wa wanafunzi Wake alikuwa ameegemea kifuani pa Yesu, ambaye Yesu alimpenda.” John alikuwa mmoja wa watu wa ndani na alipewa nafasi hii maalum ya upendeleo.

Baba Ibrahimu: Ibrahimu anaitwa baba wa waaminifu. Tunasoma hili katika Rum. 4:16 : “Kwa hiyo, ahadi huja kwa imani, ili iwe kwa neema na kuhakikishwa kwa wazao wote wa Abrahamu—si kwa wale walio wa sheria tu bali pia kwa wale walio wa imani ya Abrahamu. Yeye ndiye baba yetu sote.” Kwa kuwa imani ilikuwa msingi wa kusimama kwa Abrahamu mbele za Mungu, vivyo hivyo imani katika damu ya Yesu ndiyo njia ya kuhesabiwa haki na kusimama mbele za Mungu. Rum. 5:1-2 inatuambia, “Basi tukiisha kuhesabiwa haki itokayo katika imani, na mwe na amani kwa Mungu, kwa njia ya Bwana wetu Yesu Kristo, ambaye kwa yeye tumepata kwa njia ya imani kuifikia neema hii ambayo tunasimama ndani yake.”

Malaika au wajumbe: Hawa wangeweza kuwakilisha vyema Mitume kama msemaji wa Mungu ambaye humbeba Lazaro (Wamataifa) hadi mahali hapa pa kibali. Mungu alipomtuma Mwanawe kuwa Mkombozi wa mwanadamu, hilo liliweka msingi wa badiliko katika upendeleo wa Mungu. Yesu alisema katika Yohana 14:6, “Mimi ndimi njia, na kweli, na uzima. mtu haji kwa Baba ila kwa njia ya mimi.” Njia hii mpya ya kuja kwa Mungu inaelezewa kwa uzuri sana katika Kol. 1:12-14. Ni Mitume waliobeba ujumbe huu wa ajabu kwa ulimwengu wote, na kupitia neno lao umeshuka kwetu. Ghorofa kubwa isiyobadilika au pengo:

Je, ni nini kinachoonyeshwa na shimo kubwa au pengo kubwa ambalo lilikuwa ni utengano usiobadilika unaomzuia tajiri asipate kukifikia kifua cha Ibrahimu? Vs. 26 “Na zaidi ya hayo, kati yetu na ninyi kumewekwa shimo kubwa, ili wale wanaotaka kutoka huku kuja kwenu wasiweze, wala kutoka huko wasiweze kuja kwetu. Pengo hili au pengo kati yao lilikuwa halipitiki. Wale wa upande wowote hawakuweza kuvuka. Ghorofa hii iliyomzuia tajiri asivuke ingeweza kuwakilisha vyema... Amri ya Mungu ya kuwatupilia mbali kama Ufalme Wake wa Makuhani (Ona Kutoka 19:6, 7). Yesu alikuja kwa walio wake, lakini walio wake hawakumpokea. Israeli, yule tajiri, hangeweza kuvuka na kurudi kwenye nafasi ya upendeleo kutoka upande mwingine kwa sababu, kama taifa, walikuwa wamemkataa Yesu. Walikuwa wametupiliwa mbali na nafasi yao ya upendeleo, na mpango wao wa asili wa kuwa hazina maalum ya Mungu ulipotea milele kwao kwa sababu ya kutotii na kutoamini kwao (ingawa hii haijaonyeshwa katika fumbo hili). Kutupwa kwa taifa la Kiyahudi kulionyeshwa wazi mnamo mwaka wa 70 BK wakati walipitia mashambulizi ya moto na ya kikatili na Warumi.

Mamilioni waliuawa na wengi walisulubishwa kwenye vilima na kuta za Yerusalemu. Hivyo ndivyo maneno yao ya unabii yalivyotimia, “Damu yake na iwe juu yetu na juu ya watoto wetu.” Wale ambao waliokoka wangetawanywa (wangefichwa katika Hadesi) kotekote ulimwenguni kuteseka na mateso na mateso dhidi ya Wayahudi hadi leo. Hivyo, yule tajiri alikuwa katika mateso, akivumilia mateso na mateso makali. Kumbuka: Katika mstari wa 25 tajiri bado anaitwa mwana na bado anamwita Ibrahimu Baba. Hakutupwa mbali kabisa milele, kama Warumi 11:26 inavyotuambia waziwazi.

Ndugu watano wa yule tajiri: Imedokezwa na baadhi ya wasomi wa Maandiko kwamba kwa kuwa makabila mawili tu (Yuda na Benyamini) yalirudi kutoka utumwani Babeli, kwamba tajiri angeweza kuwawakilisha. Kwa uwiano basi, kwa kuwa tajiri mmoja aliwakilisha makabila mawili, ndugu watano wangeweza kuwakilisha makabila kumi yaliyosalia.

Makabila haya kumi mara nyingi yanajulikana kama makabila kumi yaliyopotea ya Israeli. Ombi la yule tajiri la kutaka Lazaro apelekwe kuwaonya ndugu zake watano lilikataliwa na Ibrahimu kwa msingi wa kwamba, kwa vile yale makabila kumi na mawili ya kale hayakuwa yamemwamini Musa na Manabii, wala hawatatubu ikiwa mtu aliyefufuliwa kutoka kwa wafu angehubiri habari njema. onyo kwao. Sio tu kwamba Wayahudi walikuwa wamemkataa Musa na Manabii, bali pia walikuwa wamemkataa, wamemtesa, na kumsulubisha Mwana wa Mungu mwenyewe. Israeli walikuwa wamepoteza milele nafasi yao ya kuwa Ufalme wa Makuhani kwa Mungu na kuwa sehemu ya Bibi-arusi kwa ajili ya Mwanawe. Kwa muhtasari: Kile ambacho mfano huu unatufunulia kinaonekana kuwa mabadiliko katika msimamo na upendeleo. Tajiri anatoka mahali pa kupendelewa na kwenda mahali pa kutopendelewa huku Lazaro akitoka katika hali ya kukosa kibali na kuelekea kibali. Kabla ya Israeli kumkataa Yesu, walikuwa watu maalum wa Mungu na mara nyingi walimtaja Abrahamu kuwa baba yao. Baada ya kumkataa Yesu kuwa Masihi wao, hawakushikilia tena cheo hicho cha upendeleo wakiwa taifa. Katika hatua hii Wamataifa walioamini, ambao hapo awali hawakuwa na kibali, walihamishiwa mahali pa baraka. Tunaona mabadiliko haya katika Matendo 10:34, 35. Kwa hiyo, jambo kuu ambalo fumbo hili linafunza ni kuonyesha mabadiliko katika kipindi na upendeleo kutoka kwa taifa la Israeli kwenda kwa Mataifa. Enzi ya upendeleo wa Kiyahudi ilikoma kwa taifa la Israeli na sasa nafasi yake ikachukuliwa na Enzi ya Injili ya upendeleo ambayo ilichukua mataifa yote ya Mataifa. Hili halikutenga upendeleo kwa Wayahudi mmoja-mmoja wanaoamini bali lilifanya kwa taifa zima kwa ujumla.

Nyongeza: KUZIMU NI NINI TU?

Ilitabiriwa juu ya Yesu: “Kwa sababu hutaiacha roho yangu kuzimu, wala hutamtoa Mtakatifu wako aone uharibifu” (Mdo. 2:27 KJV; pia tazama Zab. 16:10).

Kifo kimekuwa adui wa wanadamu karibu tangu kuumbwa kwake. Adhabu hii ilitolewa kwa Adamu kwa kutotii amri ya Mungu kwamba asile matunda ya “mti wa ujuzi wa mema na mabaya” au bila shaka atakufa (Mwanzo 2:17; 3:6).

Kuna mambo ya kuvutia ambayo tunapaswa kujua tunapoangalia mada hii. Agano la Kale liliandikwa kwa Kiebrania na Agano Jipya kwa Kigiriki. Neno la Kiebrania la kuzimu ni sheol. Sheol inapatikana mara 65 katika Agano la Kale. Neno hili la Kiebrania sheol limetafsiriwa katika KJV: kaburi mara 31, kuzimu mara 31, na shimo mara 3. Katika Agano Jipya kuna maneno matatu tofauti ya Kiyunani yaliyotumika katika KJV kwa ajili ya kuzimu: gehenna - kuzimu iliyotafsiriwa mara 9, na jehanamu ya moto mara 3; kuzimu - kuzimu iliyotafsiriwa mara 10, na kaburi mara 1; tartaroo - kuzimu iliyotafsiriwa mara moja. Uthabiti hauonekani kuwa sifa ya tafsiri ya King James ya Biblia.

Kulingana na Encyclopedia of Biblical Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature ya McClintock na Strong, neno la Kiingereza jehanamu lilitokana na neno la Kisaxon helan linalomaanisha kufunika na kumaanisha mahali palipofunikwa au visivyoonekana. Kamusi ya Ufafanuzi ya Vine ya Maneno ya Kibiblia inasema hadesi inaashiria kupokea kila kitu na pengine ni chimbuko la hado. Mamlaka hii pia inatuambia kwamba kuzimu ya Kiyunani inalingana na sheol ya Kiebrania.

Gehena ilikuwa mahali katika Bonde la Hinom , kusini tu ya Yerusalemu, ambapo takataka, takataka, wanyama waliokufa, na miili ya wafungwa waliouawa ilitupwa. Wakati wa Kristo, kilifanya kazi kama kichomaji ambacho moto wake uliendelea kuwaka uliteketeza na kuharibu vyote vilivyotupwa humo. Inatumika, kwa njia ya sitiari, kuashiria uharibifu kamili, sio mahali pa mateso.

Tartaroo, iliyotafsiriwa kimakosa “kutupwa kuzimu” katika 2 Pet. 2:4, kulingana na Vine, ni “mahali ambapo wale malaika ambao dhambi yao ya pekee inarejelewa katika kifungu hicho wamefungwa ‘ili kuhifadhiwa kwa ajili ya hukumu;’ eneo hilo linafafanuliwa kuwa ‘mashimo ya giza’ katika Revised Version.” Hapa, pia, sio mahali pa mateso na ni ya muda mfupi. Hadesi na kuzimu au kuzimu na kaburi ni mahali pa “pokeo wote” ambapo wale wanaokufa huenda.

Ili kuelewa vyema mada yetu, tunahitaji kujua kuhusu hali inayotokea wakati wa kifo. Yesu alisema juu ya kifo kuwa usingizi. Alipokuwa akizungumza kuhusu Lazaro, ambaye alikuwa amekufa na aliyekuwa kaburini kwa siku nne, Yesu alimrejezea kuwa alikuwa amelala ( Yoh. 11:11 ). Sikia maneno ya Ayubu: “Laiti ungenificha kuzimu, na kunificha, hata ghadhabu yako itakapopita, hata ungeniwekea wakati uliowekwa, na kunikumbuka” ( Ayubu 14:13 ). Kaburi katika mstari huu ni neno la Kiebrania sheol ambalo limetafsiriwa kuzimu katika sehemu nyingine thelathini na moja. Ikiwa sheol pangekuwa mahali pa mateso, Ayubu hangeomba kamwe kufichwa humo. Tunasoma katika Mhu. 9:5 na 10 : “Kwa maana walio hai wanajua kwamba watakufa, lakini wafu hawajui lolote; hawana malipo zaidi, na hata kumbukumbu yao imesahauliwa. Lo lote mkono wako utakalolipata kulifanya, ulifanye kwa nguvu zako zote; kwa maana huko kuzimu uendako, hakuna kazi, wala shauri, wala maarifa, wala hekima.”

Ni wazi jinsi gani maelezo haya ya hali ya kifo! Inakubaliana kabisa na ufafanuzi wa Yesu kwamba kifo ni usingizi ambao siku moja kutakuwa na kuamka. Katika Yohana 5:28, 29 Yesu alisema, “Msistaajabie neno hili; wale waliofanya mema kwa ufufuo wa uzima; na wale waliofanya mabaya kwa ufufuo wa hukumu.” Biblia inafundisha ufufuo wawili hapa. Kuna “ufufuo wa kwanza” kwa wale wanaomfuata Yesu kwa uaminifu wakati huu wa sasa, wakati wa enzi ya Injili (Ufu. 20:6), na kuna ufufuo wa hukumu kwa ulimwengu wakati wa Ufalme wa kidunia.

Ufufuo ni fundisho muhimu sana hivi kwamba Mtume Paulo alisema ikiwa hakuna ufufuo “basi mahubiri yetu na imani yenu ni bure” (1 Kor. 15:13, 14). Yesu alikufa ili kuwakomboa wanadamu wote kutoka kwa adhabu ya dhambi - kifo. 1 Tim. 2:5-6 inatuambia, “Kwa maana Mungu ni mmoja, na mpatanishi kati ya Mungu na wanadamu ni mmoja, Mwanadamu Kristo Yesu; ambaye alijitoa mwenyewe kuwa ukombozi kwa ajili ya wote, utakaoshuhudiwa kwa wakati wake.” Ni wakati huo ufaao, ambapo wanadamu wote watafufuliwa hadi wakati wa hukumu, ambapo Nabii Isaya anazungumza “...maana hukumu zako zitakapokuwa katika nchi, watu wakaao katika dunia watajifunza haki” ( Isaya 26:26; 9). Hilo ndilo jambo lile lile ambalo Wakristo wamesali kwa ajili ya miaka elfu mbili hivi katika ile inayojulikana kuwa Sala ya Bwana: “Ufalme wako uje, mapenzi yako yafanyike duniani kama huko mbinguni.” Unabii huu na maombi hakika yatatimia wakati Yesu atakaporudi pamoja na kanisa lake kusimamisha ufalme wake wa kidunia wa miaka 1,000.

Biblia inatuambia kwamba “Mungu ni upendo” (1 Yohana 4:8). Upendo haungeruhusu mateso ya milele. Wale ambao kwa kila nafasi wanakataa kutii, Mungu atawaangamiza kwa upendo. Hebu tuliondolee jina la Mungu wetu Mpendwa!

UKWELI NI NINI?

“Yesu akajibu, ‘Mimi ndimi njia na kweli na uzima. mtu haji kwa Baba ila kwa njia ya mimi” (Yohana 14:6). Biblia hupata mkazo wake katika Mwana wa Mungu. Yeye ndiye sifa kuu kutoka mwanzo hadi mwisho. Katika Agano la Kale Yeye ndiye Masihi aliyeahidiwa kwa muda mrefu anayeonyeshwa kwenye dhabihu za wanyama wa aina za Walawi. Katika Agano Jipya Yeye ndiye Nuru ya Ukweli na uhalisi wa aina zote za Agano la Kale.

Katika Yohana 8:12 Yesu alisema, “Mimi ndimi nuru ya ulimwengu. Yeye anifuataye hatakwenda gizani kamwe, bali atakuwa na nuru ya uzima." Kabla ya Yesu kupaa mbinguni, aliahidi kwamba angemtaka Baba yake atume Roho Mtakatifu kwa wanafunzi Wake ambaye angewaongoza kwenye kweli yote. “Lakini yeye atakapokuja, huyo Roho wa kweli, atawaongoza awatie kwenye kweli yote. Hatasema peke yake; atanena tu yale atakayoyasikia, na mambo yajayo atawaambia” (Yohana 16:13). Katika Yohana 8:32 na 36 tunasoma, “Ndipo mtaifahamu kweli, nayo hiyo kweli itawaweka huru.....Basi Mwana akiwaweka huru, mtakuwa huru kweli kweli. Katika Yohana 6:28, 29 tunasoma, “Kisha wakamwuliza, ‘Tufanye nini ili tuzifanye kazi (zaidi) ambazo Mungu anataka? Yesu alijibu, ‘Kazi (umoja) ya Mungu ndiyo hii—kumwamini yule aliyemtuma.’” Basi, ni juu ya msingi wa ukweli huu ndipo tunapata msingi na kiini cha kumjua Mungu na makusudi Yake. Tazama pia Warumi 10:10.

Tunaishi katika siku za udanganyifu mkuu. Ukristo unashambuliwa katika nyanja zote. Tunatakiwa kukesha na kuomba ili tusije tukaingia majaribuni. Ukweli unaweza kupatikana katika Yesu Kristo pekee. Yesu ametufunulia Mungu. 1 Kor. 1:30 inasema, "Ni kwa ajili yake (Mungu) mmekuwa ndani ya Kristo Yesu, aliyefanyika kwetu hekima itokayo kwa Mungu, yaani, haki yetu, utakatifu na ukombozi wetu." Mtume Paulo alitambua hili na alizingatia kabisa Yesu. Haya ni maneno yake katika 1 Kor. 2:2: “Kwa maana niliamua kutojua neno lo lote nilipokuwa pamoja nanyi, isipokuwa Yesu Kristo, naye amesulubiwa.” Kwa kweli Yesu ndiye chanzo cha hekima yote ya kimungu. Hii ndiyo ahadi yake kwetu katika 1 Yohana 2:27: “Na ninyi, upako mlioupokea kwake unakaa ndani yenu, wala hamhitaji mtu kuwafundisha. Lakini kama upako wake unavyowafundisha ninyi juu ya mambo yote na kama upako huo ni wa kweli, si wa bandia—kama vile ulivyowafundisha ninyi, kaeni ndani yake.” Sote tutafute KWELI katika Yesu pekee!

For centuries Bible scholars have been intrigued and perplexed by this allegory or parable of the Rich man and Lazarus as told by our Lord. The reason for this difficulty is due to the fact that some try to take this story literally, but in so doing it contradicts the testimony of the entire Bible and of our Lord Jesus Himself.

God, the Author of the Bible, gave His word to the Prophets and Apostles through the direction of His Holy Spirit. The Apostle Peter clearly tells of this in 2 Peter 1:19-21: “We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto you do well that you take heed, as unto a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day-star arise in your hearts: knowing this first, that no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation. For prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.”

God also spoke through the Apostle Paul these words: “All Scripture, given by inspiration of God, is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect (mature), thoroughly furnished unto all good work.” 2 Timothy 3: 16, 17.

Our Lord Jesus Himself declared, “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth” John 17:17.

In Mark 4:33, 34 it is stated of Jesus, “... with many such parables spoke He the word unto them, as they were able to hear it; and without a parable spoke He not unto them. And when they were alone, He expounded all things to His disciples.”

In Matthew 13:10-17 we read, “And the disciples came, and said unto Him, ‘why do you speak to them in parables?’ He answered, ‘because it is given unto you (my disciples) to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them (non-believers) it is not given.’”

In a parable, the thing said is not the thing meant. For instance, when the Lord spoke of wheat and tares, or sheep and goats, we know He was not speaking of these things literally, but rather that He used these figuratively to represent different groups of people.

With these thoughts in mind, we would like to examine this allegory or parable with the intent of showing that Jesus is teaching about the soon ending of one dispensation and the beginning of another: namely, that the Law Dispensation or Jewish Age was closing and that the Gospel Age of Grace was commencing - with favor being transferred from Israel to the Gentiles.

Before commencing, however, we would like to show the absurdity of taking this parable literally. We quote the parable here in full:

Luke 16:19-31 “There was a certain rich man who was clothed in purple and fine linen and fared sumptuously every day. But there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, full of sores, who was laid at his gate, desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table. Moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. So it was that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels to Abraham’s bosom.

The rich man also died and was buried. And being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. Then he cried and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.’ But Abraham said, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, and Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted and you are tormented. And besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that those who want to pass from here to you cannot, nor can those from there pass to us.’ Then he said, ‘I beg you therefore, father, that you would send him to my father’s house, for I have five brothers, that he may testify to them, lest they also come to this place of torment.’ Abraham said to him, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.’ And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’ “

If this Parable were taken literally:

It would be contrary to God’s character of love and mercy.
Consider what God said in regard to Israel sacrificing their children to Baal in Jeremiah 19:5: “They have built the high places of Baal to burn their sons in the fire as offerings to Baal—something I did not command or mention, nor did it enter my mind.”

It would be contrary to the Ransom.
Nowhere does it say that the rich man sinned, nor is it a sin to be rich. Even though all are sinners, the wages of sin is death, not eternal torment. God told Adam in Gen. 2:17: “You must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.” Because Adam sinned, Jesus paid the required ransom to buy back mankind from that penalty, He died. 1 Tim. 2:5-6 tells us, “...there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all men—the testimony given in its proper time.”

It would be contrary to God’s Justice.
If eternal torment had been the penalty for sin, then why did not God tell this clearly to Adam and Eve? Would it not have been dishonest and unjust on God’s part to conceal it from them?

It would negate Scriptures that depict death, hell or the grave as a place of unconsciousness.
Job 14:21: “ If his sons are honored, he does not know it; if they are brought low, he does not see it.” The dead father knows nothing pertaining to his children. Psalm 6:5: “No one remembers you when he is dead. Who praises you from the grave?” Psalm 31:17: “ Let me not be put to shame, O LORD, for I have cried out to you; but let the wicked be put to shame and lie silent in the grave.” Psalm 115:17: “It is not the dead who praise the LORD, those who go down to silence.” Psa. 146:4: “His breath goes forth, he returns to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.” Ecclesiastes 9:5,6,10: “ For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not anything, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.”

Also their love, their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun. Whatsoever, therefore, your hand finds to do, do it with your might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, where you are going.”

It would negate Scriptures that picture death as a sleep.
Daniel 12:2: “And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, some to shame and everlasting contempt.” John 11:11: “...He (Jesus) said to them, ‘Our friend Lazarus sleeps, but I go that I may wake him up.’” Acts 7:60: “ Then he (Stephen) knelt down and cried out with a loud voice, ‘Lord, do not charge them with this sin.’ And when he had said this, he fell asleep.”

Acts 13:36: “For David, after he had served his own generation by the will of God, fell asleep, was buried with his fathers, and saw corruption.” Acts 2:34 tells us that David did not ascend into heaven. 1 Corinthians 15:17-20: “And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins! Then also those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable. But now Christ is risen from the dead, and has become the first-fruits of those who have fallen asleep”.

It would be based on Satan’s first lie.
In Genesis 2:17 we read that God said to Adam that in the day that he ate of the forbidden fruit, he would die (margin: dying thou shalt die”). Satan insinuated that God was a liar in Genesis 3:4-5: “Then the serpent said to the woman, ‘You will not surely die. For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.’”

It would be contrary to God’s Righteousness.
It should be noted that this parable does not state that the rich man was bad or that he had done anything evil. Being rich and wearing purple and fine linen, in itself, does not make one either good or bad, and certainly would not justify being punished in eternal torment even if such a place did exist. If this were the case, Abraham, who was very rich, would be disqualified for the very same reason, for Gen. 13:2 states: “Abram was very rich in livestock, in silver, and in gold.” There is nothing virtuous, either, about being hungry and poor, and nothing is said as to whether the beggar, Lazarus, was righteous or full of faith. To accept the literal view of why Lazarus went to Abraham’s bosom (the place of favor) would be to believe that favor with God could be obtained by being poor and full of sores. Nothing is said about the character of either of the main characters in this allegory.

It would make void the Abrahamic promise of Genesis 12:3.
There God says that through Abraham’s seed all the families of the earth would be blessed. Rich and poor men alike are part of the all the families of the earth. Jesus, the Seed of Abraham (See Galatians 3:16), gave His life a ransom for all men to be testified in due time (1Timothy 2:5, 6).

It would present many other absurdities.
How many poor beggars could Abraham’s bosom hold? Is it reasonable to expect water to remain on the tip of Abraham’s finger, if brought into such intense heat from this fire in which the rich man now finds himself? Could the “great fixed gulf” be a literal thing? “And besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that those who want to pass from here to you cannot, nor can those from there pass to us” (vs. 26). If Abraham were in heaven, he would be a spirit being and spirit beings are not held back from crossing over any literal gulf or chasm.

It makes Abraham a liar.
Abraham tells the rich man that it would be useless to send some-one to his five brothers because even if one who was raised from the dead were to go to them, they would not listen. The Bible contradicts this literal interpretation in a number of places. Lazarus of Bethany was raised from the dead, and because of him many Jews came to accept Jesus as their Messiah (Lk. 11:43-45). When Peter raised Dorcas from the dead, Acts 9:42 tells us, “ This became known all over Joppa, and many people (Jews) believed in the Lord.” Since many had believed, because of the dead being raised, this would contradict the literal interpretation of this portion of the text.

It would remove the parable from its Scriptural context.
The question to be asked is: Who was present when Jesus spoke this parable? Was there a rich man or a poor beggar present? If Jesus meant this to refer to either man literally, it would seem logical this would be shown by the context. Verses 14 and 15 reveal to us who was present, and it was to them that Jesus directed this story, showing a hidden truth that would shortly come to pass. “The Pharisees, who loved money, heard all this and were sneering at Jesus. He said to them, ‘You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of men, but God knows your hearts. What is highly valued among men is detestable in God’s sight.’” The context reveals clearly that it is the disbelieving Pharisees to whom Jesus is directing this allegory.

Let us now consider a reasonable and symbolic interpretation.

A certain Rich Man:
The rich man, before he died, seems to well picture the Jewish nation, fleshly Israel, during the Jewish Age. He was clothed in purple and fine linen which would represent them as being God’s Kingdom of Priests (Ex. 19:6) with all the promises given them exclusively, for purple and fine linen were that which royalty wore. They fared sumptuously, eating at the table of the LORD (which favor should have led them to Christ). The death of the rich man pictures Israel ceasing to be God’s exclusive and specially-favored people “You only have I known of all the families of the earth...” (Amos 3:2), which was true throughout the Jewish age now ended. During the Gospel Age, as a nation and as God’s favored people, they have been cast off, as shown by the rich man’s death and his being consigned to Hades. In Matthew 23:38 we have Jesus’ declaration to the Jewish nation, because they rejected him: “Your house is left to you desolate...” The Jewish nation was “buried in hell (Hades)” or oblivion. The nation was scattered and “hidden” among other nations.

A Beggar named Lazarus:
Lazarus, before he died, would aptly picture the God-fearing Gentiles throughout the Jewish Age. During that Age, Gentiles were not entitled to eat the spiritual food supplied by God to His favored people, Israel (the rich man). Though they longed for spiritual food, they were only allowed to eat “the crumbs that fell from the table.” Lazarus “laid at the gate,” showing his heart longed to be blessed. Joshua 2:14; 1 Kings 10:3, 13; and 2 Kings 5:9, 10 show three Gentiles receiving such crumbs of truth, healing and/or favor. The beggar’s sores might represent his sin-sickness which was not even typically covered or atoned for as it was for the nation of Israel... We are told that dogs licked his sores. These dogs might picture the Greek philosophers that tried to help and heal in humanistic ways, but failed. After Lazarus died he seems to picture the God-fearing Gentiles who have been accorded favor with God during the Gospel Age. This is shown by his being transferred from an inferior position to that of Abraham’s bosom, a place of favor. We find an illustration of such favor as recorded in John 13:23: “Now there was leaning on Jesus’ bosom one of His disciples, whom Jesus loved.” John was one of the inner circle and was accorded this special place of favor.

Father Abraham:
Abraham is called the father of the faithful. We read this in Rom. 4:16: “Therefore, the promise comes by faith, so that it may be by grace and may be guaranteed to all Abraham’s offspring—not only to those who are of the law but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham. He is the father of us all.” As faith was the basis for Abraham’s standing before God, likewise faith in the blood of Jesus is the means of our justification and standing before God. Rom. 5:1-2 tells us, “Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand.”

The angels or messengers:
These could well represent the Apostles as God’s mouthpiece who carry Lazarus (the Gentiles) to this place of favor. When God sent His Son to be man’s Redeemer, this set the stage for a change in God’s favor. Jesus said in John 14:6, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” This new way of coming to God is beautifully described in Col. 1:12-14. It was the Apostles who carried this wonderful message to all world, and through their word it has come down to us. The great fixed gulf or chasm:

What is pictured by the great gulf or chasm that was a fixed separation keeping the rich man from having access to Abraham’s bosom? Vs. 26: “And besides all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed, so that those who want to pass from here to you cannot, nor can those from there pass to us.” This gulf or chasm between them was impassable. Those on either side could not cross over. This gulf that kept the rich man from crossing over could well represent...God’s divine decree casting them off as His Kingdom of Priests (See Exodus 19:6, 7). Jesus came to His own, but His own received Him not. Israel, the rich man, would not be able to cross back over into the position of favor from the other side because, as a nation, they had rejected Jesus. They had been cast off from their position of favor, and their original design to be God’s special treasure was forever lost to them because of their disobedience and unbelief (although this is not actually pictured in this allegory). The casting off of the Jewish nation was obviously displayed in AD 70 when they underwent a fiery and brutal attack by the Romans.

Millions were killed and many were crucified on the hillsides and walls of Jerusalem. Thus was fulfilled their own prophetic words, “His blood be upon us and our children.” Those that survived would be dispersed (hidden in Hades) throughout the world to suffer anti-Semitic pogroms and persecutions down to this day. Thus, the rich man was in torment, enduring terrible persecutions and suffering. Note: In vs. 25 the rich man is still called son and he still calls Abraham Father. He was not fully cast off forever, as Romans 11:26 plainly tells us.

The rich man’s five brothers:
It has been suggested by some scholars of Scripture that since only two tribes (Judah and Benjamin) returned from captivity in Babylon, that the rich man could represent them. Proportionately then, since the one rich man represented two tribes, the five brothers could represent the ten remaining tribes.

These ten tribes are often referred to as the ten lost tribes of Israel. The rich man’s request that Lazarus be sent to warn his five brothers was denied by Abraham on the basis that since the twelve tribes in the past had not believed Moses and the Prophets, neither would they repent if one raised from the dead were to preach a warning to them. Not only had the Jews rejected Moses and the Prophets, but they had also rejected, persecuted, and crucified the Son of God himself. Israel had forever lost its opportunity to become a Kingdom of Priests unto God and be part of the Bride for His Son. In summary: What this parable reveals to us seems to be a change in position and favor. The rich man goes from a place of favor to one of disfavor while Lazarus goes from disfavor to favor. Prior to Israel’s rejection of Jesus, they were God’s special people and often referred to Abraham as their father. After their rejection of Jesus as their Messiah, they no longer held that position of favor as a nation. At this point the believing Gentiles, who formerly were in disfavor, were transferred to a place of blessing. We see this transposition in Acts 10:34, 35. So, the main point this allegory teaches is to show a change in dispensation and favor from the nation of Israel to the Gentiles. The Jewish Age of favor ceased for the nation of Israel and was now replaced by the Gospel Age of favor which took in all the Gentile nations. This did not exclude favor to believing individual Jews but it did to the nation as a whole.

Addendum: JUST WHAT IS HELL?

It was prophesied of Jesus: “Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption” (Acts 2:27 KJV; also see Psa. 16:10)

Death has been an enemy of mankind almost since his creation. This penalty was pronounced upon Adam for his disobedience to God’s command that he was not to eat of the “tree of knowledge of good and evil” or he would surely die (Genesis 2:17; 3:6).

There are some interesting facts that we should know as we look into this topic. The Old Testament was written in Hebrew and the New Testament in Greek. The Hebrew word for hell is sheol. Sheol is found 65 times in the Old Testament. This Hebrew word sheol is translated in the KJV: grave 31 times, hell 31 times, and pit 3 times. In the New Testament there are three different Greek words used in the KJV for hell: gehenna - translated hell 9 times, and hell fire 3 times; hades - translated hell 10 times, and grave 1 time; tartaroo - translated hell once. Consistency does not seem to be a virtue of the King James translation of the Bible.

According to McClintock and Strong’s Encyclopedia of Biblical Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature, the English word hell was derived from the Saxon word helan meaning to cover and signifying the covered or invisible place. Vine’s Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words says hades signifies all-receiving and is the probable derivation of hado. This authority also tells us that the Greek hades corresponds to the Hebrew sheol.

Gehenna was a place in the Valley of Hinnom, just south of Jerusalem, where trash, garbage, dead animals, and the bodies of executed prisoners were thrown. At the time of Christ, it functioned as an incinerator whose continually burning fires consumed and destroyed all that was cast into it. It is used, metaphorically, to denote total destruction, not a place of torture.

Tartaroo, erroneously translated “cast down to hell” in 2 Pet. 2:4, according to Vine, is “the place where those angels whose special sin is referred to in that passage are confined ‘to be reserved unto judgment;’ the region is described as ‘pits of darkness’ in the Revised Version.” This, too, is not a place of torture and is of temporary duration. Hades and sheol or hell and the grave are the place “of all receiving” where those who die go.

To better understand our topic, we need to know about the condition that prevails at death. Jesus spoke of death as a sleep. When speaking of Lazarus, who had been dead and in the grave for four days, Jesus referred to him as being asleep (John 11:11). Hear the words of Job: “O that you would hide me in the grave, that you would keep me secret, until your wrath be past, that you would appoint me a set time, and remember me” (Job 14:13). Grave in this verse is the Hebrew word sheol that is translated hell in thirty-one other places. If sheol were a place of torment, Job would never have asked to be hidden there. We read in Eccl. 9:5 and 10: “For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing; they have no further reward, and even the memory of them is forgotten. Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might, for in the grave, where you are going, there is neither working, nor planning, nor knowledge, nor wisdom.”

How clear is this description of the condition of death! It totally agrees with Jesus definition that death is a sleep from which there will one day be an awakening. In John 5:28, 29 Jesus said, “Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in which all that are in the tombs shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of judgment.” The Bible teaches two resurrections here. There is the “first resurrection” for those who faithfully follow Jesus at this present time, during the Gospel age (Rev. 20:6), and there is the resurrection to judgment for the world during the earthly Kingdom.

The resurrection is such an important teaching that the Apostle Paul said if there were no resurrection “then is our preaching and your faith vain” (1 Cor. 15:13, 14). Jesus died to redeem all mankind back from sin’s penalty - death. 1 Tim. 2:5-6 tells us, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.” It is of that due time, when all mankind shall be resurrected to a time of judgment, that the Prophet Isaiah speaks “...for when thy judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness” (Isaiah 26:9). This is the very thing for which Christians have prayed for some two thousand years in what is known as The Lord’s Prayer: “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven.” This prophecy and prayer will indeed come true when Jesus returns with His church to establish His 1,000-year earthly kingdom.

The Bible tells us that “God is love” (1 John 4:8). Love would never sanction eternal torment. Those who with every chance refuse to obey, God will, in love, destroy. Let us exonerate the Name of our Loving God!

WHAT IS TRUTH?

“Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me’” (John 14:6). The Bible finds its focus in the Son of God. He is the main feature from beginning to end. In the Old Testament He is the long-promised Messiah pictured in the animal sacrifices of the Levitical types. In the New Testament He is the Light of Truth and reality of all the Old Testament types.

In John 8:12 Jesus said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” Before Jesus ascended to heaven, He promised that He would have His Father send the Holy Spirit to His disciples that would guide them into all truth. “But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come” (John 16:13). In John 8:32 and 36 we read, “Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.....So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.” In John 6:28, 29 we read, “Then they asked him, ‘What must we do to do the works (plural) God requires?’ Jesus answered, ‘The work (singular) of God is this—to believe in the one he has sent.’” It is on the foundation of this truth, then, that we find the basis and substance for knowing God and His purposes. See also Romans 10:10.

We are living in the day of great deceptions. Christianity is under attack on all fronts. We need to watch and pray lest we enter into temptation. The truth can be found in Jesus Christ alone. Jesus has revealed God to us. 1 Cor. 1:30 states, “It is because of him (God) that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.” The Apostle Paul realized this and was totally focused on Jesus. These are his words in 1 Cor. 2:2: “For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ and him crucified.” Jesus is truly the source of all godly wisdom. This is His promise to us in 1 John 2:27: “As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit—just as it has taught you, remain in him.” May we all seek TRUTH in Jesus alone!